markjgsmith

Thorsten Ball [19:43]: "Now you can give them tools and they do this on their own, and it’s truly just a for loop. The funny thing is, if you asked 100 engineers, 1/2 of them would say, it‘s just a for loop, and the others would say, with a smile on their face, IT’S JUST A FOR LOOP, like this is crazy. It‘s all in this model. You just give it output of 5 commands and then say what should I do next, and it goes and tries 15 other things because based on the previous conversation it now thinks the next best step the following, and ... and I‘m not going to use the same word again. It‘s nuts, it‘s bananas". #

Adam Stacoviak [1:13:37]: "There's a huge difference between using AI to help you think, and using AI to think for you. And if you are using AI to think for you, then we are heading for idiocracy and you're not going to make it [...] But if you are using it to help you think, now you are basically just a superhuman." #

Thorsten Ball [1:33:17]: "The really interesting bit for me is how will out engineering practices change? What code will we write by hand? What code will we generate? Thinking even further, will there be code that we don't check-in but instead we just check-in the prompt and just generate it on the fly? Will all code still be checked in?" #

Adam Stacoviak [1:33:55]: "How does this impact open source? [...] In a world where we can generate one off add hock tools, check ‘em into the code or not, keep the prompt or throw the prompt away, does the amount of open source diminish? Does my use of open source not matter as much, because can just generate anything I need?" #