Friday, June 30, 2023

Building digital asset economies

Dominic Frisby had an interesting episode on his Flying Frisby Podcast this week. It was an interview with Microstrategy CEO Michael Saylor. Saylor has made a name for himself initially by successfully running a publically traded software company for over 20 years, but more recently for his rather adventurous corporate investments in Bitcoin, something made possible by focussing on fair value rather than GAP accouting.

Microstrategy holds some of the largest amounts of Bitcoin worldwide, and has quadrupled in value by taking Bitcoin onto it's balance sheet despite the volatility. Most organisations haven't been willing to do that due to gap accounting practices which don't differentiate between gains due to operation and those due to balance sheet changes, for instance appreciation in commodity assets. Gap accounting companies run the risk of big volatility swings in Bitcoin's value eclipsing otherwise normal operations, making a company's performance look much worse than it appears.

Saylor is a Bitcoin promoter, given his holdings that much is clear, but the narratives he pushes are very well thought out, always attempting to be rooted in fundamentals. One of the narratives he has been putting forward recently, and which seems to be catching on, is that of building digital asset economies. He believes this is something that countries around the world are going to be getting into in the near term. And with the recent announcement of many large TradFi companies (Blackrock, Fidelity, Citadel, Schwab and Deutchebank) creating various flavours of Bitcoin ETFs, it does indeed seem to be trending in that direction. Multinational corporations need to park their money somewhere, and given the prospects of the US bond market, that place might very well be Bitcoin.

In the interview he notes how it’s important to distinguish between the different digital asset classes. Regulation takes time to evolve and people are only starting to understand the difference between these. Namely the difference between:

  • Digital commodities
  • Digital securities
  • Digital currencies
  • Digital tokens

I've transposed his definitions here, as I think they are useful, even if they haven't been fully endorsed by regulators yet, because they paint a very clear picture of the future financial environment that crypto and bitcoin proponents envisage.

Digital commodities

  • Assets without an issuer
  • Like Bitcoin

Digital security

  • Assets with an issuer, a controlling body creates the currency and they control it
  • Like Solana
  • Like Algorand

Digital currency

  • Stable coins, they proport to be the US dollar as a bearer instrument and a digital asset, a blockchain representation of dollars
  • Like Circle
  • Like Tether

Digital tokens

  • Like an NFT, piece of art 1 of 1
  • Like a Tom Brady coin, 10000 super fans coins that he issues, holders get to for example come to his house for a BBQ every month

Saylor then outlines the growing importance of distinguishing these:

A digital exchange is something that can trade all these things. To create a digital asset industry in your country's economy you have to have a universally accepted taxonomy of digital assets, a digital asset framework and political consensus that it’s ok to issue, trade and custody those assets.

We don’t currently have the political consensus for many things. There is a big divide. Saylor gives several very specific examples that help to illustrate the sea change that decentralised finance is bringing to the table.

  • Moving 1 million dollars from A to B without KYC would be considered money laundering in TradFi
  • Trading a security 24/7
  • Self custody a million dollars of digital assets in stable coin from an android phone
  • Self custody a million dollars of Apple stock on an android phone in India
  • Trade with a counter party that you don’t know via smart contract
  • Buy a perpetual swap derivative on a Saturday night that represents a registered public company
  • A person living in India that has 10 million dollars of Apple stock, borrowing against that from any counter party in the world on a Saturday afternoon, getting the best bid

All these things and much more are totally possible with DeFi. It's going to be interesting to watch how this evolves.

Let's welcome Meta, not block them - The author Manton Reece, founder of micro.blog, writes about the movement to pre-emptively block Meta before it has even released it's product, mentioning Open APIs, data privacy, getting your own house in order, and monocultures. Micro.blog by the way supports posting to ActivityPub, Nostr and Bluesky. Pretty cool. manton.org #

Hugging Face CEO tells US House open-source AI is ‘extremely aligned’ with American interests - I'm still amazed at how easy and cool it is that anyone in the world can watch these type of government hearings. It wasn't always like this. Isn't the world wide web awesome? Btw Hugging Face is like Github but for AI and large language models (LLMs). Open Source AI is a very interesting topic that we are only starting to grapple with. We are still in the new-ideas-permeating-everything phase which is quite confusing, but some academics trained in thinking at a macro level are starting to ask very detailed & specific questions which are highlighting the magnitude of the sea change that is ahead. venturebeat.com #

🚀 New Post: Building digital asset economies - Distinguishing between the different digital asset classes that DeFi is making available, and looking at some specific examples that demonstrate the new reality that is fast approaching. We are entering a world where new digital asset economies are being forged. markjgsmith.com #

Showing the last 1 active days.

For more content, use the navigation tree in the sidebar to explore the full archives.